Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Liev Schreiber Takes Naomi Watts and the Kids on a Bicycle Built for Four!

Piling the whole family on two wheels, Liev Schreiber took Naomi Watts and their two boys on a bike ride in New York City on Tuesday (October 15).


The "Impossible" Star balanced behind her beefy beau while Alexander and Samuel rode in child seats on the front and back.


Next month, the 45-year-old actress covers Allure magazine and tells the publication all about how she landed her main man.


Admitting she made the first move, Naomi shares, "It was a lot more ballsy than I would ever normally be. He got up to say he was leaving, and I was like, 'Oh, shit.' So I said something cheeky. 'Don't you want my digits?' It made him laugh."


Source: http://celebrity-gossip.net/naomi-watts/liev-schreiber-takes-naomi-watts-and-kids-bicycle-built-four-942986
Tags: mrsa   Cnn.com   hocus pocus   Gia Allemand   National Ice Cream Day  

CineAsia to Honor Intercontinental Group Holdings Limited’s Terry Lai and Rigo Jesu


Intercontinental Group Holdings Limited's Honorary Group chairman Terry Lai and adviser Rigo Jesu will be honored with the CineAsia lifetime achievement award in distribution at this year's convention.



The duo will be recognized at a Dec. 12 awards ceremony set to take place at the Hong Kong Convention & Exhibition Centre.


"It is with great pleasure that we are able to honor Terry Lai and Rigo Jesu with the CineAsia 2013 lifetime achievement award in distribution," said Robert H. Sunshine, co-managing director of the annual convention. "Both Terry and Rigo have a long and acclaimed history that makes them a 'tour de force' in distribution, production, content creation, video, gaming and live performances."


Lai established Intercontinental Film Distributors (HK) Limitedin 1969 to produce and export Chinese films around the world. This success led to the establishment of Intercontinental Group Holdings Limited in 1996, which today is an organization more than 400 employees with a turnover in the HK$600 million range. Its businesses include film and video distribution, cinema operations, advertising and promotion services, video games distribution, e-commerce and character products merchandising.


Rigo began his career in entertainment at Capital Artists Limited, where he was promoted to the position of acting general manager in 1973. In 1980, he formed his own company, Jesu International Entertainment Limited, and later joined Intercontinental Film Distributors (H.K.) Limited, focusing mainly on the sourcing of foreign films and introducing them into Hong Kong. In 1985, he shuttered his business to focus on the growth and development of IFDL and its parent, Intercontinental Group Holdings Limited, as managing director. From 2005-11, he served as co-CEO of Intercontinental Group before shifting into the role of adviser.


CineAsia 2013 will take place from Dec. 10-12 at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre. It will feature screenings of upcoming Hollywood films, sponsored events, timely and informative seminars,and the CineAsia Trade Show.


CineAsia is produced by Prometheus Global Media, owner of The Hollywood Reporter.


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HollywoodReporterAsia/~3/jIVZZbIUy_I/story01.htm
Category: Common App   torrie wilson   Bill De Blasio   The Butler   loretta lynn  

White House: House Republican plan too partisan

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House says the latest proposal from House Republican leaders for reopening the government and extending the nation's borrowing cap is a partisan effort to appease tea party conservatives. It praises bipartisan negotiations in the Senate as a good-faith effort to end the partial government shutdown and avoid an economy-shaking default.


The White House also announced it will meet with House Democratic leaders Tuesday afternoon as negotiations continue and a deadline to raise the debt ceiling moves ever closer.


White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage says a proposal from House GOP leaders that would attach health care law changes to shut-down and debt ceiling measures is a, quote, "partisan attempt to appease a small group of tea party Republicans who forced the government shut down in the first place."


Source: http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-house-republican-plan-too-partisan-151746336--finance.html
Related Topics: new orleans saints   food network star  

Obama calls business leaders, governors about debt ceiling, shutdown


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama spoke by phone to a group of about 150 leaders of major businesses on Friday afternoon to give them an update on talks with Congress on lifting the debt ceiling ahead of a default deadline next week, the White House said.


"The president reiterated that his first order of business is to urge Congress to reopen the government and remove the threat of default, and then he is willing to engage with Congress on a long-term budget," the White House said.


Obama also spoke with a group of 25 state governors about the government shutdown, now in its 11th day, and its impact on state budgets and the economy.


"He argued that the prolonged shutdown is having adverse consequences on consumer confidence and businesses, and is hurting local economies across the country that rely on tourism at national parks and monuments," the White House said.


(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; editing by Jackie Frank)



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-calls-business-leaders-governors-debt-ceiling-shutdown-222722298--business.html
Tags: Nexus 5   Mayweather   khan academy   Best Song Ever   The Conjuring  

Review: Bridget Jones older, shallower and boring

"Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy" (Alfred A. Knopf), by Helen Fielding


Time has dulled Bridget Jones.


It has also left her neither wiser, more relaxed nor comfortable with the person she's become and the people she counts as her friends.


That's both good and bad because in Helen Fielding's "Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy," the British heroine — whose sense of self was so strong and so entertaining in the first two novels that it created an archetype of self-determination belaboring amusing bouts of self-confidence — is lost amid social media, parental responsibility and trying to impress the moms at school.


So how, now, is Bridget Jones at 51? Content in marriage to Mark Darcy? Happily ensconced in having quit smoking, raising two children and avoiding the trap of being a smug married woman?


In a word, no. Darcy is dead and Bridget is a single mother to their two children, dating a man whose age is around half her own while her best mates find themselves vacillating between adult responsibility and living their lives as the unfettered and unbound twenty- and thirty-somethings they used to be.


It's been nearly 20 years since "Bridget Jones's Diary" was published in 1996, vaulting Fielding from freelance reporter to one of Britain's best-known and most popular writers. The 1999 sequel, "Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason," continued Bridget's bold, if not brassy, tales.


But it seems that fear of being a 51-year-old single parent raising two young children in the age of social media is too much for her.


Fielding strives throughout the book to add relevance to her character's life and all of its foibles, mishaps and happy accidents. It's just not enough, though not for lack of trying. Perhaps that's an echo of the time that Bridget and her readers live in, with the short bursts of information, a focus on the quick and a general intolerance for taking time to do things.


Source: http://news.yahoo.com/review-bridget-jones-older-shallower-boring-211157185.html
Similar Articles: kobe bryant   Justin Bieber Spits On Fans   Spain train crash   gold cup   Chromecast  

Demand Media co-founder, chairman, CEO Rosenblatt exits


By Jennifer Saba


(Reuters) - Demand Media Inc Chairman and CEO Richard Rosenblatt is leaving the online content company he co-founded, its board announced on Monday.


The directors named Shawn Colo, who is also a co-founder, as the company's interim president and chief executive. James Quandt, a board member, was named chairman.


The board said in a news release it would start a search for a permanent CEO shortly.


"I realize that all journeys must ultimately come to an end and want to wish Shawn and the entire team success as they continue to grow the business," Rosenblatt said in the release.


Rosenblatt did not immediately respond to a request for comment and a spokeswoman said the company had no comment beyond the release.


Demand offered scant clues on Rosenblatt's sudden exit. He has led Demand Media and been a constant presence during earnings calls since the company went public in 2011.


Jordan Rohan, an analyst with Stifel, wrote in a note to investors, "The change is not entirely surprising given the pressure from Google's (algorithm) changes on the content business, the overall strategic drift in the company and waning share price."


Founded in 2006, Demand Media was a closely watched experiment in how to create content inexpensively by tapping a network of thousands of freelancers for "how-to" articles and videos. It makes money from advertising when its content shows up high on search results.


It owns sites such as eHow, Cracked and Livestrong as well as a top-level domain business, which it is planning to spin out.


In recent years, Demand Media has been hurt by changes Google Inc has made to its search algorithm meant to weed out content that it said was of lesser quality. Demand relies heavily on Google for traffic referrals.


Shares of Demand Media were unchanged in after-hours trading on Monday after closing flat at $5.85. In the past year, shares are down 44 percent.


(Reporting by Jennifer Saba in New York; editing by Matthew Lewis)



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/demand-media-co-founder-chairman-ceo-rosenblatt-exits-212306003--sector.html
Similar Articles: kanye west   How To Close Apps On Ios7   Ray Rice   yemen   pippa middleton  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

What's Your Most Positive Tech Support Experience?


One time I called Time Warner customer service because the internet was out in my apartment. The man I spoke to was friendly. He had information about an outage in my area. He had an estimate of how long it would be before service was restored. And he was allowed to tell me that estimate.


This kind service rep even said he was making a special note of my call and gave me his full name so I could reach him again if I needed additional assistance. Out of all the unavoidable calls I've made to big corporations this was the only positive experience I've ever had. I treasure the memory.



Customer service is generally a black spot that grows and eats away at any souls in its path, but every once and awhile it can be okay. Take this exchange (excerpted above) between a customer and a Netflix service rep in which there is a productive discussion about the customer's concern PLUS totally appropriate, G-rated pirate role-play. I mean that just seems like a good time. Share your holy grail of tech support below.



Source: http://gizmodo.com/whats-your-most-positive-tech-support-experience-1444562178
Tags: eddie aikau   peyton manning   new york times  

Friday, October 11, 2013

Goodbye, tracking cookies? Don't celebrate just yet


October 11, 2013









Is there something in the water? First Google, now Microsoft, is rumored to be working on technologies to replace tracking cookies for online advertising.


The secrecy surrounding these projects is no big deal, but what's bound to be a big deal is if they replace a well-known  (if a widely hated) system with a complete unknown.


Word about Google's "AdID" technology started circulating back in September, when USA Today reported about "an anonymous identifier for advertising ... that would replace third-party cookies" for the sake of end-user ad-tracking. The system is allegedly intended to give consumers "more privacy and control over how they browse the Web," and would be used with advertisers that have "agreed to basic guidelines" -- although it's not clear if those guidelines are designed to better favor consumers or advertisers.


USA Today's anonymous source within Google couldn't give more details, in part because the proposal was soon slated to be circulated amongst "industry participants, government bodies and consumer groups."


Speculation has since raged about what Google is planning and to what end. Some believe Google may be trying to follow the same model Apple created for iOS via its iAd platform -- the latter of which attracted unwanted attention from U.S. regulatory agencies back in 2010 (and which may well have been instrumental in allowing Google to purchase AdMob in the same timeframe).


When Google was pressed for more details, a "Google spokesperson" (according to multiple outlets) would only reply: "We believe that technological enhancements can improve users' security while ensuring the Web remains economically viable. We and others have a number of concepts in this area, but they're all at very early stages."


Those two words, "and others", might well have been a hedge, but perhaps Google knew something that everyone else has just now gotten wind of as well.




Source: http://www.infoworld.com/t/web-browsers/goodbye-tracking-cookies-dont-celebrate-just-yet-228652?source=rss_infoworld_blogs
Similar Articles: tony romo   Josh Freeman   Sydney Leathers   Jenna Wolfe   phil mickelson  

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Covered California back online after upgrades

Online enrollment is available for California's new health insurance exchange after technical glitches on the system's opening day forced overnight upgrades.

Covered California spokesman Roy Kennedy says the enrollment portion of the exchange website was taken offline from 8:30 p.m. Tuesday until 10:45 a.m. Wednesday. He said pages were loading slowly and that logos for insurance plans were not displaying correctly.

Click to read more.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/53168295/ns/local_news-sacramento_ca/

huffington post What is ricin Boston Marathon Explosion Boston Marathon bombing irs Friends Reunion Elena Delle Donne

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Nokia Lumia 520 (AT&T) Windows 8 Pre-Paid Smartphone $84.99 shipped at TigerDirect

Nokia Lumia 520 (AT&T) Windows 8 Pre-Paid Smartphone TigerDirect has the Nokia Lumia 520 (AT&T) Windows 8 Pre-Paid Smartphone for $89.99 - $5 off coupon code "ITL101428" = $84.99 with free shipping. Features: Windows 8 OS, 4.0" touchscreen, 5MP camera, microSD slot, 1GHz dual-core Snapdragon processor, and 8GB storage. TIGER DIRECT

link

Source: http://bfads.net/Nokia-Lumia-520-ATT-Windows-8-PrePaid-Smartphone-8499-shipped-at-TigerDirect

diane sawyer Washington Election Results drudge report Presidential Election 2012 Incumbent politico Tammy Baldwin

Monday, September 23, 2013

Foster makes more anti-NCAA statements in documentary

Texans running back Arian Foster

Texans running back Arian Foster says the NCAA?s opposition to paying athletes is based not on morality but on a decision made decades ago by ?six, seven, whatever old white guys? that ran the organization, and he says its refusal today to consider the issue of paying student-athletes is ?cowardly.?

Foster is among a half-dozen former college athletes ? and by far the highest-profile player ? whose comments are included in? ?Schooled: The price of College Sports,? an 80-minute documentary produced for the entertainment channel EPIX scheduled to air Oct. 16.

Foster, in excerpts from the documentary released Friday on Sports Illustrated?s website, acknowledged that he received money while playing at the University of Tennessee from 2004 through 2009. He did not detail the source of the funds during his comments in the documentary or in comments Friday as the Texans prepared for their game Sunday at Baltimore.

He was and is, however, critical of the NCAA?s insistence that it will not pay student-athletes beyond the value of an athletic scholarship.

?I am a firm believer that an employee should get paid for his work,? he said. ?And 100 percent I see student-athletes as employees. Hiding from it is just cowardly.?

As part of a segment concerning criticism of athletes like former Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor and former Auburn quarterback Cam Newton who were accused of accepting or soliciting extra benefits, Foster said, ?The fact that it?s normal to look at a television and hear negative comments about a kid is just backwards to me.?

He added, ?Schools make millions on millions on the backs of 18-year-old kids and then you have the audacity to sanction them because those are the rules. But what are the rules? We (the NCAA) made the rules up. This isn?t a question of morality. This is a question of however many, like six, seven, whatever, old white guys made up a rule saying athletes can?t get paid, not because they?re amateurs. It?s because we don?t want to pay them. That?s it.?

Foster also said he played college football because ?the NCAA is the best farm club for the NFL.?

?Schooled: The Price of College Sports? is based on the e-book ?The Cartel: Inside the Rise and Imminent Fall of the NCAA? by historian Taylor Branch, who is interviewed in the documentary along with, among others, sportscasters Bob Costas and Jay Bilas, journalists Jose Nocera of The New York Times, Frank Deford of Sports Illustrated, University of Nebraska-Lincoln chancellor Harvey Perlman, former Nike consultant Sonny Vaccaro and former UCLA football players Johnathan Franklin of the Packers and Jeff Locke of the Vikings.

Also interviewed is Kent Waldrep, the former TCU running back from Alvin who was left paralyzed following a game against Alabama in 1974 and unsuccessfully sued the university for workman?s compensation after the university claimed he was recruited and played football ?as a student, not an athlete.?

?When that question of student-athlete came up in court I almost started laughing, because it wasn?t the chairman of the business school that who came to my high school and took me to lunch. It was only football coaches,? he said.

EPIX is available through Dish Network, Suddenlink, Verizon FiOS and Charter Communications, among others, but is not available on DirecTV or Comcast Xfinity. It also is available via subscription online and through mobile and streaming devices.

Source: http://blog.chron.com/ultimatetexans/2013/09/foster-makes-more-anti-ncaa-statements-in-documentary/

Pray For Boston Anne Frank What Happened In Boston gold price defiance Ny Post Boston Bombing 2013

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Prehistoric Pets | KTLA 5

Jessica Holmes and Frank Buckley were live with a preview of the 10th Annual North American Reptile Breeders Conference and Trade Show. Jay Brewer of Prehistoric Pets showed off some cold-blooded creatures that will make an appearance at the show this weekend.

North American Reptile Breeders Conference & Trade Show Returns to Anaheim

WHAT:
Cold-blooded creatures return to Anaheim the weekend of September 20th with the 10th?Annual North American Reptile Breeders Conference & Trade Show. Open to the public, this high quality, captive-bred-only reptile show brings together top dealers from across the country offering thousands of exotic and pet-friendly ?herps.? With prices ranging from $5 to $50,000, everything from the common gecko to extraordinarily rare breeds of snakes with unusual morphing of colors will be represented.? Don?t miss this opportunity to get up-close and personal with snakes, frogs, turtles, geckos, iguanas, tortoises and purchase all of the supplies needed to start or support a herp hobby!

WHEN:
Saturday, September 21, 2013 from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday, September 22, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

WHERE:
Anaheim Convention Center
800 West Katella Avenue
Anaheim, California 92802

TICKETS:
Adults: $15 for a weekend pass
Children under 13: $8 for a weekend pass/Children under 5: FREE
Boy Scouts & Girl Scouts: $5

SPONSORS:
Zoo Med, Timberline, Reptiles by Mac, Gourmet Rodent,? Reptiles Magazine, Marc Bailey Reptiles, Pythonregius.com and Kingsnake.com

BENEFIT:
The USARK / PIJAC Benefit Auction on Saturday, September 21, at 7:00 p.m.
Marriott Ballroom across the street from the Convention Center
Admission is FREE includes hors d?oeuvres and live auction

INFO:
Call 708/932-8044, email info@narbc.com, or visit our websites at www.narbc.com or www.reptileconference.com

Source: http://ktla.com/2013/09/17/prehistoric-pets/

C7 Corvette Scandal 2013 Oscar Nominations social security social security bethenny frankel sacramento kings

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Georgetown councilman's former employer seeks foreclosure to collect debt

If you already have a user account, please enter your username/password here to login. If you don't currently have a username or password, please select a service from the available services to the right.

If you are a new subscriber, please choose from the following selections below. If you already have established a user account before, please login by using the panel on the left.

1 Day1 day(s)/$1.00

1 Day


1 Month30 day(s)/$7.95

Online Subscription


3 Months91 day(s)/$23.85

Online Subscription


6 Months183 day(s)/$47.70

Online Subscription


One Year365 day(s)/$95.40

Online Subscription

CURRENT PRINT SUBSCRIBERS:
To Get Your FREE User Name & Password
click here.


Source: http://www.the-messenger.com/articles/2013/09/16/local_news/doc5237060c4e78f448415922.txt

mta Beyonce Superbowl nemo redbox Nemo Storm weather forecast Rivals

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Who Owns The Moon?

The moon is not as far away as some things, but it's definitely farther away than your nearest McDonalds or the bottom of the ocean or, you know, anything on Earth at all. Basically it's not easily accessible. So it would be pretty presumptuous for a person or group to say that they owned a certain part of it. Or all of it. But it's kind of complicated to figure out what would happen if anyone tried.

Read more...


    






Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/LenCRdLLBVw/who-owns-the-moon-1321620432

Becky G danity kane jessica biel lil kim drake VMA 2013 robin thicke

Monday, September 16, 2013

Solange and Theophilus London

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://misterand.tumblr.com/post/61350823036

The Lumineers grammys frank ocean Justin Timberlake Grammys Lena Dunham elton john weather nyc

Summers withdraws name from Fed consideration

File- This Dec. 17, 2010 file photo shows Director of the National Economic Council Lawrence Summers arriving for the tax cut extension bill during a ceremony at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex in Washington. President Barack Obama says he has accepted Lawrence Summers' decision to withdraw from consideration for the role of Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Obama says Summers was a critical member of his economic team and says he is grateful for his service on behalf of the country. Summers was the leading candidate to replace current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke but faced opposition from some Democrats. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

File- This Dec. 17, 2010 file photo shows Director of the National Economic Council Lawrence Summers arriving for the tax cut extension bill during a ceremony at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex in Washington. President Barack Obama says he has accepted Lawrence Summers' decision to withdraw from consideration for the role of Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Obama says Summers was a critical member of his economic team and says he is grateful for his service on behalf of the country. Summers was the leading candidate to replace current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke but faced opposition from some Democrats. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

(AP) ? Lawrence Summers, who was considered the leading candidate to replace current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, has withdrawn his name from consideration, the White House said Sunday.

In a statement, President Barack Obama said he had accepted Summers' decision.

"Larry was a critical member of my team as we faced down the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it was in no small part because of his expertise, wisdom and leadership that we wrestled the economy back to growth and made the kind of progress we are seeing today," Obama said. As director of the National Economic Council, Summers oversaw the administration's response to the economic and financial crisis early in Obama's first term.

Still, Summers faced opposition from some Democrats, including members of the Senate Banking Committee. Summers alluded to the opposition to his candidacy in a letter he sent to Obama Sunday to formally withdraw from consideration.

"I have reluctantly concluded that any possible confirmation process for me would be acrimonious and would not serve the interests of the Federal Reserve, the administration or ultimately, the interests of the nation's ongoing economic recovery," he wrote.

Summers' ascent to the top of the list to succeed Bernanke rankled some of the president's liberal supporters. He was seen as having been too cozy with Wall Street and was criticized for controversial comments he made about women and math and science.

Shaunna Thomas, co-founder of the women's rights group UltraViolet, welcomed Summers' withdrawal, saying she hopes it serves as "a reminder to all that sexism has no place anywhere in society and certainly not in the highest levels of our government." Thomas called on Obama to nominate current Fed vice chairwoman Janet Yellen, another candidate on Obama's short list, to take over Bernanke's job.

Obama vigorously defended Summers in recent weeks, both in public comments and in closed-door meetings with lawmakers.

"I will always be grateful to Larry for his tireless work and service on behalf of his country, and I look forward to continuing to seek his guidance and counsel in the future," Obama said Sunday.

The president has also been facing trouble with his liberal base on other fronts this year, including revelations about the National Security Agency's spying programs and his call for a military strike against Syria.

Summers' decision could make Yellen the leading candidate to replace Bernanke. Yellen, who became a member of the Fed's board of governors in 1994, would be the first woman to run the Fed.

Obama is expected to announce his nomination as early as this month. Bernanke's term ends Jan. 31, 2014.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-09-15-US-Federal-Reserve-Summers/id-8d056acfe9d34af18e148a7fadd56ee7

Walmart Black Friday 2012 Paula Broadwell Tilted Kilt Barbara Palvin Nick Foles Auguste Rodin Breaking Amish

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Chance the Rapper: Everybody's Something

Chance the Rapper's breakout mixtape, Acid Rap, is my favorite thing I've laid ears on in a long, long time. Inspired in part by Chance's experiences on LSD, it's a piece of music that jaunts through something like half a dozen different genres from jazz to funk to soul to pop to create some a trippy, upbeat version of hip hop.

Read more...

Source: http://gizmodo.com/chance-the-rapper-everybodys-something-1287145932

mega millions winning numbers autism speaks ubaldo jimenez ncaa final country music awards autism awareness angelman syndrome

The National Association of Realtors is on Board. ?Delay Flood ...

Here is FEMA's new Rate Sheet Let us know what your Flood Insurance will be ht? goo.gl/fb/mvnbL

About an hour ago from Stop Fema Now's Twitter via Google

The National Association of Realtors is on Board. ?Delay Flood Insurance Rate I? goo.gl/fb/pOlrZ

About an hour ago from Stop Fema Now's Twitter via Google

Here is FEMA's new Rate Sheet Let us know what your Flood Insurance will be... fb.me/2xI0cVnRw

About 2 hours ago from Stop Fema Now's Twitter via Facebook

The National Association of Realtors is on Board.?Delay Flood Insurance Rate Increases?... fb.me/1ILEyP0yp

About 2 hours ago from Stop Fema Now's Twitter via Facebook

?There?s not a lot of time to take action,? she said. ?It?s unbelievable how ma? goo.gl/fb/3JOwm

About 3 hours ago from Stop Fema Now's Twitter via Google

Source: http://www.stopfemanow.com/2013/09/09/the-national-association-of-realtors-is-on-board-delay-flood-insurance-rate-i/

sandra fluke costa rica Earthquake Costa Rica Clinton speech Michael Strahan Griselda Blanco Michelle Obama Speech

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

JSS15Q update did not totally resolve touchscreen issues for some Google Nexus 7 (2013) tablets

Last month, we told you how some Google Nexus 7 (2013) users were having issues with the touchscreen on the tablet. These issues included double taps, ghost taps and overall erratic behavior from the touchscreen. Other issues were found with the GPS. The issues gave Consumer Reports a reason to recommend that readers refrain from purchasing the slab until all of the problems were fixed. That was despite the publication's glowing review of the tablet's display.

Google sent out what is known in certain social circles as the JSS15Q update. Yes, as guests at an exclusive party consumed caviar, they talked about multimillion dollar deals, their beach homes in the Hamptons, their hired help and the JSS15Q update.

While the update was believed to fix all of the problems that were afflicting the tablet, that hasn't been the case. Some new buyers of the tablet are still having problems with the screen even after the update is installed. Some are speculating that the problem lies with incorrect calibration, which could be fixed via another update.

The worse case scenario is that a grounding issue is the reason for the touchscreen fiasco and that could not be solved with a software update. The idea that this is a grounding issue comes from some of the Nexus 7 (2013) screens which work perfectly when held or plugged in, but suffer ghost touches and have erratic behavior when lying on a flat surface.

Google continues to investigate the problems. If you do own a Nexus 7 (2013) experiencing touchscreen issues, we recommend that you return the tablet for another unit.

source: YouTube via AndroidAuthority

Source: http://www.phonearena.com/news/JSS15Q-update-did-not-totally-resolve-touchscreen-issues-for-some-Google-Nexus-7-2013-tablets_id46941

WRAL John Harbaugh jill biden jill biden martin luther king jr baltimore ravens ravens

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Sweet Baby Abby | Babies | The Pretty Blog

Little?Abby Barker?s parents, Rachel and Larry, says everyone who meets their ?little?ray of sunshine? falls in love with her. And it?s not just the proud parents?who think so. We also couldn?t resist these happy photos of the young family. Abby?is just the most cheerful and gorgeous girl. Crystal Stokes met up with the?Bakers at their home in Charlotte, South Carolina, to capture their everyday?life with their young daughter.

Source: http://www.theprettyblog.com/family-and-kids/sweet-baby-abby/

roseanne barr Cnn Electoral Map dixville notch Remember Remember The 5th Of November guy fawkes gary johnson gary johnson

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Sports briefs for the week of August 13



Source: http://www.ladysmithchronicle.com/sports/219453361.html

les miserables jennifer lawrence Oscar Winners 2013 quentin tarantino jessica chastain jessica chastain oscars

Vintage Burning Man Photos Provide Rare Glimpse Into The Birth Of A Counterculture

It's hard to believe that Burning Man's early years involved little more than a handful of hippies dancing around a seaside San Francisco bonfire.

Since its humble beginnings in 1986, the festival has swelled into an international phenomenon, drawing more than 60,000 individuals to the remote Nevada desert each August and spawning a subculture that permeates year round.

This collection of photos, provided exclusively to The Huffington Post, reveals a simpler side of The Burn, with founder Larry Harvey and his cohorts setting the scene first on SF's Baker Beach, and a few years later, in Nevada's pop-up paradise of Black Rock City.

Behold, a rare glimpse inside the origins of what is now a worldwide way of life:

arrival
Baker Beach Arrival, 1989.


burning man
Raising the Man, Baker Beach, 1989.


assemble
Assembling the Man, Baker Beach, 1989.


loading
Loading Seven Sections on Seven Pickups, 1989.


drummer
Drummer, Black Rock Pre-Burn, 1990.


black rock pioneer
Black Rock Pioneer Burners, 1990.


larry crimson
Larry and Crimson Rose, Pre-Burn, 1998.


BONUS: The story of the playa is now a major motion picture! "Spark: A Burning Man Story" opened August 16, 2013. For more information on the film, available on VOD, check out showtimes and locations here.

Earlier on HuffPost:

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/19/vintage-burning-man-photos_n_3770030.html

Chad Johnson engadget spurs macrumors neil patrick harris Austin Mahone E3 2013

Monday, August 5, 2013

10 Tips For Raising Resilient Kids | Psych Central

10 Tips For Raising Resilient KidsWhile adulthood is filled with serious responsibilities, childhood isn?t exactly stress-free. Kids take tests, learn new information, change schools, change neighborhoods, get sick, get braces, encounter bullies, make new friends and occasionally get hurt by those friends.

What helps kids in navigating these kinds of challenges is resilience. Resilient kids are problem solvers. They face unfamiliar or tough situations and strive to find good solutions.

?When they step into a situation, [resilient kids] have a sense they can figure out what they need to do and can handle what is thrown at them with a sense of confidence,? said Lynn Lyons, LICSW, a psychotherapist who specializes in treating anxious families and co-author of the book Anxious Kids, Anxious Parents: 7 Ways to Stop the Worry Cycle and Raise Courageous and Independent Children with anxiety expert Reid Wilson, Ph.D.

This doesn?t mean that kids have to do everything on their own, she said. Rather, they know how to ask for help and are able to problem-solve their next steps.

Resilience isn?t birthright. It can be taught. Lyons encouraged parents to equip their kids with the skills to handle the unexpected, which actually contrasts our cultural approach.

?We have become a culture of trying to make sure our kids are comfortable. We as parents are trying to stay one step ahead of everything our kids are going to run into.? The problem? ?Life doesn?t work that way.?

Anxious people have an especially hard time helping their kids tolerate uncertainty, simply because they have a hard time tolerating it themselves. ?The idea of putting your child through the same pain that you went through is intolerable,? Lyons said. So anxious parents try to protect their kids and shield them from worst-case scenarios.

However, a parent?s job isn?t to be there all the time for their kids, she said. It?s to teach them to handle uncertainty and to problem-solve. Below, Lyons shared her valuable suggestions for raising resilient kids.

1. Don?t accommodate every need.

According to Lyons, ?whenever we try to provide certainty and comfort, we are getting in the way of children being able to develop their own problem-solving and mastery.? (Overprotecting kids only fuels their anxiety.)

She gave a ?dramatic but not uncommon example.? A child gets out of school at 3:15. But they worry about their parent picking them up on time. So the parent arrives an hour earlier and parks by their child?s classroom so they can see the parent is there.

In another example, parents let their 7-year-old sleep on a mattress on the floor in their bedroom because they?re too uncomfortable to sleep in their own room.

2. Avoid eliminating all risk.

Naturally, parents want to keep their kids safe. But eliminating all risk robs kids of learning resiliency. In one family Lyons knows, the kids aren?t allowed to eat when the parents are not home, because there?s a risk they might choke on their food. (If the kids are old enough to stay home alone, they?re old enough to eat, she said.)

The key is to allow appropriate risks and teach your kids essential skills. ?Start young. The child who?s going to get his driver?s license is going to have started when he?s 5 [years old] learning how to ride his bike and look both ways [slow down and pay attention].?

Giving kids age-appropriate freedom helps them learn their own limits, she said.

3. Teach them to problem-solve.

Let?s say your child wants to go to sleep-away camp, but they?re nervous about being away from home. An anxious parent, Lyons said, might say, ?Well, then there?s no reason for you to go.?

But a better approach is to normalize your child?s nervousness, and help them figure out how to navigate being homesick. So you might ask your child how they can practice getting used to being away from home.

When Lyons?s son was anxious about his first final exam, they brainstormed strategies, including how he?d manage his time and schedule in order to study for the exam.

In other words, engage your child in figuring out how they can handle challenges. Give them the opportunity, over and over, ?to figure out what works and what doesn?t.?

4. Teach your kids concrete skills.

When Lyons works with kids, she focuses on the specific skills they?ll need to learn in order to handle certain situations. She asks herself, ?Where are we going with this [situation]? What skill do they need to get there?? For instance, she might teach a shy child how to greet someone and start a conversation.

5. Avoid ?why? questions.

?Why? questions aren?t helpful in promoting problem-solving. If your child left their bike in the rain, and you ask ?why?? ?what will they say? I was careless. I?m an 8-year-old,? Lyons said.

Ask ?how? questions instead. ?You left your bike out in the rain, and your chain rusted. How will you fix that?? For instance, they might go online to see how to fix the chain or contribute money to a new chain, she said.

Lyons uses ?how? questions to teach her clients different skills. ?How do you get yourself out of bed when it?s warm and cozy? How do you handle the noisy boys on the bus that bug you??

6. Don?t provide all the answers.

Rather than providing your kids with every answer, start using the phrase ?I don?t know,? ?followed by promoting problem-solving,? Lyons said. Using this phrase helps kids learn to tolerate uncertainty and think about ways to deal with potential challenges.

Also, starting with small situations when they?re young helps prepare kids to handle bigger trials. They won?t like it, but they?ll get used to it, she said.

For instance, if your child asks if they?re getting a shot at the doctor?s office, instead of placating them, say, ?I don?t know. You might be due for a shot. Let?s figure out how you?re doing to get through it.?

Similarly, if your child asks, ?Am I going to get sick today?? instead of saying, ?No, you won?t,? respond with, ?You might, so how might you handle that??

If your child worries they?ll hate their college, instead of saying, ?You?ll love it,? you might explain that some freshmen don?t like their school, and help them figure out what to do if they feel the same way, she said.

7. Avoid talking in catastrophic terms.

Pay attention to what you say to your kids and around them. Anxious parents, in particular, tend to ?talk very catastrophically around their children,? Lyons said. For instance, instead of saying ?It?s really important for you to learn how to swim,? they say, ?It?s really important for you to learn how to swim because it?d be devastating to me if you drowned.?

8. Let your kids make mistakes.

?Failure is not the end of the world. [It?s the] place you get to when you figure out what to do next,? Lyons said. Letting kids mess up is tough and painful for parents. But it helps kids learn how to fix slip-ups and make better decisions next time.

According to Lyons, if a child has an assignment, anxious or overprotective parents typically want to make sure the project is perfect, even if their child has no interest in doing it in the first place. But let your kids see the consequences of their actions.

Similarly, if your child doesn?t want to go to football practice, let them stay home, Lyons said. Next time they?ll sit on the bench and probably feel uncomfortable.

9. Help them manage their emotions.

Emotional management is key in resilience. Teach your kids that all emotions are OK, Lyons said. It?s OK to feel angry that you lost the game or someone else finished your ice cream. Also, teach them that after feeling their feelings, they need to think through what they?re doing next, she said.

?Kids learn very quickly which powerful emotions get them what they want. Parents have to learn how to ride the emotions, too.? You might tell your child, ?I understand that you feel that way. I?d feel the same way if I were in your shoes, but now you have to figure out what the appropriate next step is.?

If your child throws a tantrum, she said, be clear about what behavior is appropriate (and inappropriate). You might say, ?I?m sorry we?re not going to get ice cream, but this behavior is unacceptable.?

10. Model resiliency.

Of course, kids also learn from observing their parents? behavior. Try to be calm and consistent, Lyons said. ?You cannot say to a child you want them to control their emotions, while you yourself are flipping out.?

?Parenting takes a lot of practice and we all screw up.? When you do make a mistake, admit it. ?I really screwed up. I?m sorry I handled that poorly. Let?s talk about a different way to handle that in the future,? Lyons said.

Resiliency helps kids navigate the inevitable trials, triumphs and tribulations of childhood and adolescence. Resilient kids also become resilient adults, able to survive and thrive in the face of life?s unavoidable stressors.

?

Margarita Tartakovsky, M.S. is an Associate Editor at Psych Central and blogs regularly about eating and self-image issues on her own blog, Weightless.

APA Reference
Tartakovsky, M. (2013). 10 Tips For Raising Resilient Kids. Psych Central. Retrieved on August 6, 2013, from http://psychcentral.com/lib/10-tips-for-raising-resilient-kids/00017272

Scientifically Reviewed
????Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 25 Jul 2013
????Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.

?

Source: http://psychcentral.com/lib/10-tips-for-raising-resilient-kids/00017272

London 2012 shot put London 2012 Track And Field Jordyn Wieber michael phelps Kerri Strug Ledecky Nadia Comaneci

Elite can?t rescue the Bank of Israel governor

Jacob Frenkel and Leo Leiderman could be elected to the next Knesset on the roster of Yesh Atid, if that party (whose name means ?There Is a Future?) still has a future by then. Hong Kong and Deutsche Bank will not bother them; they will seek the public?s trust, because according to the Israeli system, trust is wholesale, not retail ? we buy the whole package. All that...

The full text is available for subscribers & registered users.

Source: http://haaretz.feedsportal.com/c/34191/f/620529/s/2f865666/sc/7/l/0L0Shaaretz0N0Copinion0C0Bpremium0E10B539579/story01.htm

gavin degraw gavin degraw alec time 100 bob beckel anna paquin warren buffett

Paul Ryan: Government Shutdown Strategy Is 'Swinging For The Fences' On Obamacare

  • Healthcare In America Is Already 'The Best In The World'

    One of the more positive sounding admonitions from health care reform opponents was that the United States had "the best health care in the world," so why would you mess with it? Well, it's true that if you want the experience the pinnacle of medical care, you come to the United States. And if you want the pinnacle of haute cuisine, you go to Per Se. If you want the pinnacle of commercial air travel, you get a first class seat on British Airways. Now, naturally, you wouldn't let just anyone mess with someone's tasting menu or state-of-the-art air-beds. But like anything that's "the best," the best health care in the world isn't for everybody. The costs are prohibitively high, the access is prohibitively exclusive, and the resources are prohibitively scarce. What do the people in America who "fly coach" in the health care system get? Well, at the time of the health care reform debate, they were participating in a system that was, by all objective measurements, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/24/us-health-care-expensive_n_624248.html">overpriced and underperforming</a> -- if you were lucky enough to be participating in it. As anyone who's fortunate enough to have employer based health care or unfortunate enough to have a pre-existing condition can tell you, health care for ordinary people already involved all of those things that we were told would be a feature of the Affordable Care Act -- long waits, limited choice, and rationing. When the <a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Fund-Reports/2010/Jun/Mirror-Mirror-Update.aspx">Commonwealth Fund rated health care systems by nation</a>, the top marks in the surveyed categories went to the United Kingdom, New Zealand and the Netherlands. Ezra Klein examined the study, and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/06/us_health-care_system_still_ba.html">observed</a>: "The issue isn't just that we don't have universal health care. Our delivery system underperforms, too. 'Even when access and equity measures are not considered, the U.S. ranks behind most of the other countries on most measures. With the inclusion of primary care physician survey data in the analysis, it is apparent that the U.S. is lagging in adoption of national policies that promote primary care, quality improvement, and information technology.'"

  • Death Panels

    The only thing that perhaps matched the vastness of the spread or the depth of the traction of the "death panel" lie was the predictability that such a lie would come to be told in the first place. After all, this was a Democratic president trying to sell a new health care reform plan with the intention of opening access and reducing cost to millions of Americans who had gone without for so long. What's the best way to counter it? Tell everyone that millions of Americans would have increased access ... <i>to Death!</i> The best account of how the "death panel" myth was born into this world and spread like garbage across the landscape has been penned by Brendan Nyhan, who in 2010 wrote "Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate." <a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/health-care-misinformation.pdf">You should go read the whole thing</a>. But to summarize, the lie began where many lies about health care reform begin -- with serial liar Betsy McCaughey, who in 1994 <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/andrew-sullivans-mccaughe_n_313157.html">polluted the pages of the New Republic</a> with a staggering pile of deception in an effort to scuttle President Bill Clinton's health care reform. As Nyhan documents, she re-emerged in 2009 when "she invented the false claim that the health care legislation in Congress would result in seniors being directed to 'end their life sooner.'" Nyhan: "McCaughey's statement was a reference to a provision in the Democratic health care bill that would have provided funding for an advanced care planning for Medicare recipients once every five years or more frequently if they become seriously ill. As independent fact-checkers showed (PolitiFact.com 2009b; FactCheck.org 2009a), her statement that these consultations would be mandatory was simply false--they would be entirely voluntary. Similarly, there is no evidence that Medicare patients would be pressured during these consultations to "do what's in society's best interest...and cut your life short." But the match that lit the death panel flame was not McCaughey, it was Sarah Palin, who repeated McCaughey's claims in a Facebook posting and invented the term "death panel." As Nyhan reports, Palin's claims were met with condemnation from independent observers and factcheckers, but the virality of the term "death panel" far outstripped its own debunking. To this day, the shorthand for this outrageous falsehood remains more firmly planted in the discourse than the truth. One thing worth pointing out is that Palin, in creating the term "death panel," <i>intended</i> to deceive people with it. In an interview with the <em>National Review</em>, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228636/rogue-record/rich-lowry">Palin admitted</a>: "The term I used to describe the panel making these decisions should not be taken literally." Rather, it was "a lot like when President Reagan used to refer to the Soviet Union as the 'evil empire.' He got his point across." Of course, while Reagan was exaggerating for effect, he wasn't trying to prey on the goodwill of those who were listening to him.

  • The Affordable Care Act Is A "Jobs-Killer"

    Naturally, the GOP greeted anything that the Obama White House did -- from regulating pollution to flossing after meals -- as something that would "kill jobs." The Affordable Care Act was no different. As you might recall, Republicans' first attempt at repeal came in the form of an inartfully named law called the "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act." But did the health reform plan threaten jobs? Not by any honest measure. <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/01/17/106950/is-health-care-law-really-a-job.html">Per McClatchy Newspapers</a>: <blockquote>"The claim has no justification," said Micah Weinberg, a senior research fellow at the centrist New America Foundation's Health Policy Program. Since the law contains dual mandates that most individuals must obtain health insurance coverage and most employers must offer it by 2014, "the effect on employment is probably zero or close to it," said Amitabh Chandra, a professor of public policy at Harvard University.</blockquote> As McClatchy reported, the "job-killing" claim creatively used the "lie of omission" -- relying on "out of date" data or omitting "offsetting information that would weaken the argument." The Congressional Budget Office, playing it straight, deemed it essentially too premature to measure what the effect the bill would have on the labor market. At the time, Speaker John Boehner dismissed the CBO, saying, "CBO is entitled to their opinion." Perhaps, but lately, job growth in the health care industry has <a href="https://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2012/03/07/Jobs-report-preview" target="_hplink">bucked the economic downturn and health care has remained a robust sector of employment</a>. And it stands to reason that enrolling another 30 million Americans into health insurance will increase the demand for health care services and products, which in turn should trigger the creation of more jobs. Is there a downside? Sure. More demand, and greater labor costs, could push health care prices upward even as other effects of health reform push them down. But it's more likely that repealing the bill will have a negative impact on jobs than retaining it.

  • The Affordable Care Act Would Add To The Deficit

    The only thing more important than painting the Affordable Care Act as a certain killer of jobs was to paint it as a certain murderer of America's fiscal future. Surely this big government program was going to push indebtedness to such a height that our servitude to our future Chinese overlords was a <i>fait accompli</i>. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/18/cbo-score-on-health-care_n_502543.html">As Ryan Grim reported in May of 2010</a>, the CBO disagreed: <blockquote>Comprehensive health care reform will cost the federal government $940 billion over a ten-year period, but will increase revenue and cut other costs by a greater amount, leading to a reduction of $138 billion in the federal deficit over the same period, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, a Democratic source tells HuffPost. It will cut the deficit by $1.2 trillion over the second ten year period. The source said it also extends Medicare's solvency by at least nine years and reduces the rate of its growth by 1.4 percent, while closing the doughnut hole for seniors, meaning there will no longer be a gap in coverage of medication.</blockquote> Recently, the CBO updated its ten-year estimate by dropping off the first two years of the law (where there was little to no implementation) and adding two years at the back end (during which time there would be full implementation). As you might imagine, replacing two years of low numbers with two years of higher numbers increased the ten-year estimate. But opponents of the bill immediately freaked out and declared the costs to have skyrocketed. <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/03/obamacare-haters-angered-by-facts.html">As Jonathan Chait reported</a>: <blockquote>The outcry was so widespread that the CBO took the unusual step of releasing a second update to explain to outraged conservatives that they were completely misreading the whole thing: "Some of the commentary on those reports has suggested that CBO and JCT have changed their estimates of the effects of the ACA to a significant degree. That's not our perspective. ... Although the latest projections extend the original ones by three years (corresponding to the shift in the regular ten-year projection period since the ACA was first being developed), the projections for each given year have changed little, on net, since March 2010." That is CBO-speak for: "Go home. You people are all crazy."</blockquote> As Chait goes on to note, the CBO now projects that "the law would reduce the deficit by slightly more than it had originally forecast."

  • The Affordable Care Act $500 Billion Cut From Medicare

    Normally, if you tell Republicans that you're going to cut $500 billion from Medicare, they will respond by saying, "Hooray, but could we make it <i>$700 billion</i>?" But the moment they got it into their heads that the Affordable Care Act would make that cut from Medicare, suddenly everyone from the party of ending Medicare As We Know It, Forever got all hot with concern about what would happen to these longstanding recipients of government health care. In fairness, <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/a-final-weekend-of-whoppers/">as Factcheck pointed out</a>, the GOP opponents of Obama's plan were simply picking up a cudgel that had recently been wielded by the president himself: <blockquote>Whether these are "cuts" or much-needed "savings" depends on the political expedience of the moment, it seems. When Republican Sen. John McCain, then a presidential candidate, proposed similar reductions to pay for his health care plan, it was the Obama camp that attacked the Republican for cutting benefits.</blockquote> <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/a-final-weekend-of-whoppers/">Nevertheless</a>! <blockquote>Whatever you want to call them, it's a $500 billion reduction in the growth of future spending over 10 years, not a slashing of the current Medicare budget or benefits. It's true that those who get their coverage through Medicare Advantage's private plans (about 22 percent of Medicare enrollees) would see fewer add-on benefits; the bill aims to reduce the heftier payments made by the government to Medicare Advantage plans, compared with regular fee-for-service Medicare.</blockquote> The <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i> <a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1005588">concurred</a>: <blockquote>A phased elimination of the substantial overpayments to Medicare Advantage plans, which now enroll nearly 25% of Medicare beneficiaries, will produce an estimated $132 billion in savings over 10 years. [...] The ACA also produces nearly $200 billion in savings by assuming that providers can improve their productivity as firms in other industries have done. On the basis of this presumed improvement, the law reduces Medicare's annual "market basket" updates for most types of providers - a provision that has generated controversy.</blockquote> The law doesn't cut any customer benefits, just the amount that providers get paid. Hospitals and drug companies agreed to these cuts based on the calculation that more people with insurance meant more people consuming what they sell and, more importantly for the hospitals, fewer people getting treated and simply not paying for it.

  • The Affordable Care Act Provides Free Health Care For Undocumented Immigrants

    This lie was launched to prominence with the help of a false accuser, South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson, who famously heckled President Barack Obama during an address to a Joint Session of Congress by yelling "You lie!" after the president had mentioned that undocumented immigrants would not be eligible for the credits for the bill's proposed health care exchanges. As Time's Michael Scherer pointed out, this was not much of a challenge for factcheckers: <blockquote>In the Senate Finance Committee's working framework for a health plan, which Obama's speech seemed most to mimic, there is the line, "No illegal immigrants will benefit from the health care tax credits." Similarly, the major health-care-reform bill to pass out of committee in the House, H.R. 3200, contains Section 246, which is called "NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS."</blockquote> In fact, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/why_immigrants_get_short_shrif.html">as Ezra Klein pointed out</a>, the Affordable Care Act "goes out of its way to exclude" undocumented immigrants: <blockquote>As the AP points out...there are about 7 million unauthorized immigrants who will be prohibited from buying insurance on the newly created exchanges, even if they pay out of their own pocket. And the exclusion of this group from health reform -- along with other restrictions that affect fully legal immigrants as well -- could create a massive coverage gap that puts a strain on the rest of the health system as well.</blockquote> Klein goes on to add that "immigrants-rights advocates tried to prevent this scenario from happening," but they ended up losing to the politics of the day. The concession they won was a promise from the president that he would shepherd a comprehensive immigration reform package through the legislature. They lost that round, too.

  • Republicans, And Their Ideas, Were Left Out Of The Bill And The Process

    Were health care policies dear to Republicans left out of the health care reform bill? Totally! <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2009/10/29/171026/top-10-reasons-why-republicans-should-support-the-house-health-bill/">Unless we're counting the following</a>: --Deficit-neutral bill --Longterm cost reduction --Interstate competition that allows consumers to purchase insurance across state lines --Medical malpractice reform --High-risk pools --An extension of the time young people were allowed to remain on their parents' policies --No public money for abortion --Small business exemptions/tax credits --Job wellness programs --Delivery system reform In fact, the Democrats were eager to get GOP input and enthusiastic about including many of their desired components in the bill. Oh, and did we mention that the Affordable Care Act was modeled on a reform designed and implemented by a former Republican governor and presidential candidate, whose innovation was widely celebrated by the GOP while said former governor was running for president? And did we mention that the individual mandate that was used in Romneycare to ensure "no free riders" was originally dreamed up by the Heritage Foundation? And did we add that additional DNA of the Affordable Care Act was borrowed from the Senate GOP alternative to the Clinton plan in the 1990s and the <a href="http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/news/press-releases/2009/08/bipartisan-policy-center-releases-report-improving-health-care-quality-a" target="_hplink">2009 Bipartisan Policy Committee plan</a>, which was endorsed by Tom Daschle, Howard Baker, and Bob Dole? As for the process, you might recall that the White House very patiently waited for the bipartisan Gang Of Six to weigh in with its own solution, and openly courted one Republican gang member, Sen. Chuck Grassley, long after it was clear to every reporter inside the Beltway that Grassley was intentionally acting in bad faith. And perhaps you don't recall the bipartisan health care summit that was held in March of 2009? if so, don't feel bad about it -- RNC Chairman Michael Steele couldn't remember it either, <a href="http://politicalcorrection.org/blog/201002250005">when he yelled at the president for not having one</a>.

  • The Demonization Of 'Deem And Pass'

    So, here's a fun little story about obscure parliamentary procedures. In May of 2010, as the health care reform michegas was steaming toward its endgame, it looked like the measure might fall. The Senate had passed a bill, but the House was stuck in a bit of a jam. It had no other choice but to take a vote on the Senate's bill, because if the House bill ended up in a conference committee to be reconciled with the Senate's, the whole resulting she-bang was assured of a filibuster, as the Democrats had, in the intervening period, lost their Senate supermajority. But the House had a problem. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/16/health-care-opponents-dem_n_501353.html">As I wrote at the time</a>: <blockquote>House members are averse to doing anything that looks like they approve of the various side-deals that were made in the Senate -- like the so-called "Cornhusker Kickback." The House intends to remove those unpopular features in budget reconciliation, but if they pursue budget reconciliation on a standard legislative timeline -- where they pass the Senate bill outright first and then go back to pass a reconciliation package of fixes -- they'd still appear to be endorsing the sketchy side deals, and then the GOP would jump up and down on their heads. Enter "deem and pass." Under this process, the House will simply skip to approving the reconciliation fixes, and "deem" the Senate bill to be passed. By doing it this way, the Democrats get the Senate bill passed while simultaneously coming out against the unpopular features of the same.</blockquote> "Deem and pass" is the aforementioned obscure parliamentary procedure. And here's the thing about obscure parliamentary procedures -- everyone <i>loves</i> them when their side is doing them, but when they're being <i>done to you</i>, then they are basically evil schemes from the blasted plains of Hell. So if you're guessing that the Republicans declared the Democrats' use of "deem and pass" -- which also carried the moniker "the Slaughter Rule," after Rep. Louise Slaughter, who proposed its use in this instance -- to be a monstrous and unprecedented abuse of power, then give yourself a prize! And give yourself a bonus if you guessed that in reality, the GOP had used "deem and pass" <i>lots of times</i>. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/16/house-has-long-history-of_n_500623.html">As Ryan Grim reported</a>, "deeming resolutions" had been in use dating back to 1933, and in 2005 and 2006, Republicans employed them 36 times. Other Republicans complained that Slaughter was supporting a tactic that she once vigorously opposed. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/the_arms_race_of_rules.html">That's true</a>! She fought the "deem and pass" during the Bush administration and lost. Which is precisely when she learned how effective it could be!

  • The Affordable Care Act Would Create A Mad Army of IRS Agents

    Lots of people wouldn't mind having better access to more affordable health care. But what if it came with thousands of IRS agents, picking through your stool sample? That sounds pretty bad. It also sounds pretty implausible! But that was no impediment to multiple health care reform opponents making claims that the tax man was COMMINAGETCHA! In this case, the individual mandate -- which requires people to purchase insurance or incur a tax penalty -- provided the fertile soil for this deception to spread. A March 2010 floor speech from a panicked Sen. John Ensign was typical of the genre: <blockquote>My amendment goes to the heart of one of the problems with this bill. There is an individual mandate that puts fines on people that can also attach civil penalties. And 16,500 new IRS agents are going to be required to be hired because of the health care reform bill.</blockquote> March of 2010 was a pretty great time for this particular lie. In one five day period, Ensign was joined by Reps. Paul Ryan ("There is an individual mandate. It mandates individuals purchase government-approved health insurance or face a fine to be collected by the IRS which will need $10 billion additional and 16,500 new IRS agents to police and enforce this mandate."), Pete Sessions ("16,000 new IRS agents will be hired simply to make sure that this health care bill is enforced.") and Cliff Stearns ("There is $10 billion to hire about 16,000 new IRS agents to enforce the individual mandate on every American"). All wrong! <a href="http://factcheck.org/2010/03/irs-expansion/">Per Factcheck</a>: <blockquote>This wildly inaccurate claim started as an inflated, partisan assertion that 16,500 new IRS employees might be required to administer the new law. That devolved quickly into a claim, made by some Republican lawmakers, that 16,500 IRS "agents" would be required. Republican Rep. Ron Paul of Texas even claimed in a televised interview that all 16,500 would be carrying guns. None of those claims is true. The IRS' main job under the new law isn't to enforce penalties. Its first task is to inform many small-business owners of a new tax credit that the new law grants them -- starting this year -- which will pay up to 35 percent of the employer's contribution toward their workers' health insurance. And in 2014 the IRS will also be administering additional subsidies -- in the form of refundable tax credits -- to help millions of low- and middle-income individuals buy health insurance. The law does make individuals subject to a tax, starting in 2014, if they fail to obtain health insurance coverage. But IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman testified before a hearing of the House Ways and Means Committee March 25 that the IRS won't be auditing individuals to certify that they have obtained health insurance.</blockquote> As Factcheck goes on to note, <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf">on page 131 of the bill that was passed</a>, the IRS is explicitly prohibited from "from using the liens and levies commonly used to collect money owed by delinquent taxpayers, and rules out any criminal penalties for individuals who refuse to pay the tax or those who don't obtain coverage."

  • Affordable Care Act Bill Is Way Too Long And Impossible To Read!

    Oh, Congresscritters, the poor dears! So many bills to read and so little time -- between raising campaign cash at lush fundraisers and receiving marching orders from powerful corporate interests -- to actually read them all. <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019629.php">And this Affordable Care Act was a real humdinger of a long bill</a>. And long bills are bad because length implies complication and complication requires study and study implies some form of "work." So the proper thing to do is to mulch the entire print run of the bill and use it to power the boiler that heats the "sex dungeon" in the Longworth Office Building, the end! Actually, reading the bill is not that hard, despite the complaints. As the folks at <a href="http://computationallegalstudies.com/2009/11/08/facts-about-the-length-of-h-r-3962/">Computational Legal Studies were able to divine</a>: <blockquote>Those versed in the typesetting practices of the United States Congress know that the printed version of a bill contains a significant amount of whitespace including non-trivial space between lines, large headers and margins, an embedded table of contents, and large font. For example, consider page 12 of the printed version of H.R. 3962. This page contains fewer than 150 substantive words. We believe a simple page count vastly overstates the actual length of bill. Rather than use page counts, we counted the number of words contained in the bill and compared these counts to the number of words in the existing United States Code. In addition, we consider the number of text blocks in the bill -- where a text block is a unit of text under a section, subsection, clause, or sub-clause.</blockquote> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/09/house-health-care-bill-ac_n_350810.html">As HuffPost noted in March of 2010</a>, "the total number of words in the House Health Reform Bill are 363,086," and when you throw out the words in the titles and tables of contents and whatnot, leaving only words that "impact substantive law," the word count drops to 234,812. "Harry Potter And the Order Of The Phoenix," a popular book read by small children, is 257,000 words long. (Although in fairness to Congress, the Affordable Care Act contains very few exciting accounts of Quidditch matches.)

  • The 2012ers Join The Fun

    We couldn't have a list of Affordable Care Act distortions without noting the ways some of your 2012ers have added to the canon. Herman Cain said that if the ACA had been implemented, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/177511-video-cain-if-obamacare-had-been-implemented-already-id-be-dead-">he'd be dead</a>. Not likely! The new law expands coverage so that uninsured individuals who face what Cain faced (cancer) have a better chance of getting coverage, and it restricts insurers from tossing cancer patients off the rolls based on their "pre-existing condition." But more to the point, Cain would have always been the wealthy guy who could afford to choose his doctor and pick the care he wanted. The Affordable Care Act doesn't prohibit wealthy people from spending money. Rick Santorum says that his daughter, who is diagnosed with a genetic disorder called trisomy 18 and who required special needs care, <a href="http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/04/25/santorum-more-disabled-people-will-be-denied-care-under-obamacare/">would be "denied care" under the Affordable Care Act</a>. Nope! Again, the law restricts insurers from throwing people with pre-existing conditions off their rolls. And for individuals under 19, that went into effect in September of 2010. Michele Bachmann believes that the Affordable Care Act would open "sex clinics" in public schools. This is Michele Bachmann we're talking about. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/bachmann-sex-clinics-will_n_306292.html">Do you even need to ask</a>? And finally, Mitt Romney has said, as recently as March 5, that he never intended his CommonwealthCare reform to serve as a "model for the nation." "Very early on," he insisted, "we were asked -- is what you've done in Massachusetts something you would have the entire government do, the federal government do? I said no, from the very beginning." Unless "very early on" and "from the very beginning" mean something different from the conventional definition of those phrases, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/05/438044/romney-mandate-model-video/">Romney should augment his daily pharmaceutical intake with some memory-enhancing gingko biloba</a>.

  • So Many More To Choose From!

    Obviously, we did what we could to include as many of these lies and distortions as possible, but there's no way to include them all. If you're a completist, however, be sure to check out the <a href="http://www.thefrisky.com/2012-03-14/fact-or-fiction-obamacare%E2%80%99s-1-dollar-abortions/">Impossible Tale Of The One-Dollar Abortion</a>, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/09/AR2011020905682.html">Story of the State-Based Inflexibility That Wasn't</a>, <a href="http://politicalcorrection.org/factcheck/201101210006">The Curious Case of the Politically Connected Waivers</a> and <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/dc-dispatches/2011/03/michele-bachmanns-health-care-cover-charges-hard-fathom">Nancy Drew And The Hidden $105 Billion Expenditure</a>.

  • Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/04/paul-ryan-government-shutdown_n_3704568.html

    acc tournament big ten tournament big east tournament 2012 solar storm spanx solar flares mary j blige